Another day, another lawsuit. This time the plaintiffs argued that the IRS’s interpretation of the ACA was contrary to the statute, which, they asserted, authorizes tax credits only for individuals who purchase insurance on state-run exchanges, but not on federal exchanges. The court ruled “that the plain text of the statute, the statutory structure, and the statutory purpose make clear that Congress intended to make premium tax credits available on both state-run and federally-facilitated exchanges,” wrote U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman. “What little relevant legislative history exists further supports this conclusion and certainly—despite plaintiffs’ best efforts to suggest otherwise—it does not undermine it.”
Freedom isn’t free. It costs folks like you and me. If you don’t throw in your buck-oh-five, who will?
Who do professional tax preparers call when they need help? The answer is, like many…
Tax season is a busy time for everyone involved, but it's especially important for taxpayers…
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will be shutting down its Modernized e-File (MeF) system on…
The PTIN portal is officially open for new 2024 PTINs and for PTIN renewals for…
An Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) is a nine-digit number issued by the Internal Revenue…
A "tax purpose" for an individual is the reason why they file a tax return…
This website uses cookies.